newletterlogo.jpg (12506 bytes)

Survey Says:  Fishing Has A Future!

Some people believe that fishing has limited appeal beyond a core of white, middle-aged male anglers, and that the future of the sport is therefore dim. But a recently completed national study indicates that interest in fishing is alive in many quarters, even among some people who have never before baited a hook. And the good news is that target marketing can lure more participants to the sport.

Complete findings of the Future of Fishing project will be published this month by Responsive Management, the Harrisonburg, Va., research firm that conducted the groundbreaking study over the last year. For information on how to obtain a copy, contact Responsive Management Executive Director Mark Duda by fax, (540) 432-1892, or by e­mail, mdduda@rica.net.

Duda said the $200,000 study, funded through a federal aid grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is the first major national study to identify specific strategies for increasing the number of anglers, as well as reasons for their recent decline.

"The successful marketing and promotion of fishing relies on careful selection of target markets," Duda said. "This survey provides us with careful, quantified information on who's interested in fishing and who isn't, what groups are likely to respond to fishing promotions, and what other things these people are interested in."

Responsive Management, which specializes in fishing, hunting and outdoors research, first gathered information during focus group meetings with specific market groups around the country. Researchers used the issues raised in those sessions to formulate questions for an extensive national telephone survey of 1,500 anglers and 1,500 non-anglers, conducted this summer, then further refined the survey results during a second round of focus group meetings.

The country was broken down into six geographical regions for the survey, and data is available for each separate region as well as collectively.

The Future of Fishing report concludes that several markets would be receptive to information and outreach about freshwater fishing, including:  

  • 12- to 15-year-old anglers and non­-anglers.

  • Anglers who also jet-ski, canoe/kayak, golf, shoot targets, watch wildlife, camp, or ride mountain bikes.

  • Non-anglers who also hunt (including big game hunters), camp in campgrounds, climb rocks, jet-ski, or ride mountain bikes.

  • Anglers who hold college degrees, but not graduate or professional degrees.

  • African-American anglers and non-anglers.

  • Hispanic/Latino anglers and non-anglers.

  • Great Lakes area anglers.

  • 25- to 34-year-old anglers.

  • Anglers with annual incomes between $20,000 and $39,999.

  • Anglers with over $100,000 in annual income.

Groups most likely to be affected by outreach about saltwater fishing include:

  • Non-anglers with Hispanic or Latino backgrounds.

  • Non-angling African Americans.

  • American Indian and native Alaskan anglers.

  • 18 to 24-year-old non-anglers.

  • 12- to 15-year-old non-anglers.

  • Anglers age 65 years and older.

  • Anglers with a college or professional degree.

  • Anglers with incomes over $100,000 per year.

  • Anglers who also climb rocks, water-ski or jet-ski.

  • Non-anglers who also ride mountain bikes or motor boats.

  • Anglers who live in the Southeast.

Duda explained that several groups who expressed low interest in fishing at the beginning of the survey are recommended as viable target markets because they demonstrated a tendency toward greater interest after discussing the subject with surveyors.

Activity-Based Marketing

"What really jumps out when looking at the results is how strongly fishing- needs to be marketed with other outdoor activities, like canoeing, camping, target shooting, or hunting," Duda said. "If we could encourage people to incorporate fishing with those activities that they already participate in or that they do more often – encourage them to take along their fishing rod when they go camping or hunting, for instance – it could be very effective."

Bruce Matthews, president of the Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation, agreed that the findings indicate there are "tremendous possibilities" for co-marketing angling with other sports and leisure activities. He believes the Future of Fishing study, completed just in time for the recent meeting of RBFF's market identification task force, will be a valuable tool in accomplishing the foundation's goals.

"This study has given us a whole new way to look at the concept of marketing boating and fishing," Matthews said. "The findings underscore the need to think outside of the box in our efforts ... We've never looked at the demographics in terms of activities before. It's pretty interesting, considering that fishermen tend to see jet skiers as the bane of their existence, that jet skiers turned out to be one of the segments among non-anglers who are most interested in both freshwater and saltwater fishing."

Why We Fish

Experts who have reviewed the data noted that, in rating their motivation for fishing, anglers offered reasons that were "mostly social in nature" – including spending time with family or friends (25 percent), or simply relaxing (33 percent). "Those answers ought to give some direction to nationwide marketing efforts," said Robin Knox of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, a member of the Future of Fishing oversight committee.

For oversight committee member Bob Wattendorf of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the popularity of fishing's social aspects offer a solution to the problem most people blame for lack of fishing – lack of time.

"That's an issue that comes up in virtually every study," he said. "Obviously, there are only 24 hours in a day, so there has to be competition for what people do with that time, and with a strong economy, more people are working more, which is hard to compete with. The way to turn it around is to make fishing look like a time saver, something you can do in conjunction with other activities. If you want to spend some time with your kids, and some time doing something to relax, and some time getting outside, why not combine it all by taking the family on a fishing trip?"

Presented with a list of situations, survey participants were asked to choose those that would make them want to go fishing or to fish more often. For anglers and non-anglers, the top two answers were the same – being asked by a child (88 percent of anglers, 65 percent of non-anglers) or by a friend (86 percent of anglers, 60 percent of non-anglers).

Both Matthews and Wattendorf said they see promise for some sort of "take an adult fishing" campaign in those answers. "This study has told us that a large number of individuals would be more motivated to go fishing if a kid asked them, and it also tells us that 12- to 15-year-olds' interest in fishing increased significantly after just talking and thinking about it for a while," Wattendorf said.

Knox said several other answers also suggest effective marketing possibilities, including "fishing as part of a vacation," which appealed to 81 percent of anglers and 45 percent of non-anglers.

"Look at some of the other answers cited by non-anglers – having a fishing location where all of the gear is provided (45 percent), or being able to borrow fishing gear for free (39 percent) would make them want to go fishing," Knox said. "That's what ASA's Fishing Tackle Loaner Program is all about. So there are some cases where something may already be in place."

Getting the Message Out

The Future of Fishing report indicates that neither anglers nor non-anglers regard the sport negatively. Vast majorities of both freshwater and saltwater anglers said they are satisfied with their fishing experiences. However, the results also show that only a slight majority of anglers and 40 percent of non-anglers remembered seeing any positive advertising, information or news coverage about fishing. "We're not getting the message out," Duda said.

Only 31 percent of anglers and 13 percent of non-anglers could recall seeing anything in the media in the past year that would have helped them go fishing or learn about fishing. For those who said they had seen such information, the most popular sources they named were television fishing shows (33 percent of anglers, 28 percent of non-anglers), fishing magazines (21 percent of anglers, 19 percent of non­-anglers) and TV in general (20 percent for both).

Knox said that, while the numbers demonstrate the importance of TV fishing shows, they also highlight a current oversight. "The statistics indicate that fishing shows are watched far more widely by white males than by any other group," he said. "And yet African Americans and Hispanics combine to make up 10 percent of anglers in the U.S. We should be seeing more African-American and Hispanic anglers on programs about fishing."

Knox also warned marketers to realize that "there is no such thing as a general public." The need for regionally specific marketing was illuminated for him as he observed discussions of a focus group comprised of teenagers and their parents. Group members said they generally are less impressed by national marketing campaigns than by more local efforts, perhaps featuring sports figures from their region.

"There are some things you can do on a national level, of course, but you have to spend some time on your local markets," Knox said. "Fishing and fishing preferences are different across the country. What may or may not be effective can vary from one region to another."

A Few Surprises

Wattendorf said the greatest surprise the study held for him was the number of people who told surveyors they would be willing to buy fishing licenses "simply as a way of contributing to the conservation of resources" -- 84 percent of anglers and 51 percent of non-anglers. "That got a much more positive reaction than I expected," he said. "That suggests to me that there are some groups out there – including senior citizens, who in some states do not have to hold a license in order to fish, or even some people who do not fish at all – who would buy a license anyway as a way to support conservation efforts in their states."

In addition to the information the Future of Fishing provides on markets that are worth targeting – and just as valuable to the industry – are the statistics it offers about those who are least likely to respond to such efforts. While some low-interest groups demonstrated propensities for increased interest as they acquired more information about fishing, others remained unlikely prospects. Among those who showed the least interest in freshwater and saltwater fishing were female anglers and non-­anglers.

Bruce Matthews predicted that information will surprise many people. "We've tended to view women as a market with great potential – not only as anglers themselves, but for introducing the sport to young children," he said. "I don't think anyone should dismiss that potential based on the findings of this study. I think women constitute a market that we need to consider further."

Duda agreed, noting that the study's findings reflect the reactions of groups "as a whole. What we need to do is to hone in on particular segments of the female market to determine what groups among women are interested and who would be receptive to messages about fishing."

The Future of Fishing project was administered by the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, with IAFWA’s Melanie Tarver as project manager. Other oversight committee members were Bob Miles, IAFWA; Vishwanie Maharaj, South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; and Sylvia Cabrera, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

American Sportfishing, Vol. 2, No. 8.  November 1999.

return to LMRCC newsletter main page